TexasCHLforum.com

Abraham wrote:Four score and seven threads ago, lunatics brought forth on this website, a new era conceived of re-posting madness.

Abe

03Lightningrocks wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

Ameer wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

jmra wrote:

. , sigh...

..

Ameer wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

jmra wrote:Abraham who?

The biblical character?

Lincoln was a character, but I don't think he was in the bible. Unless I missed something.

Abraham Lincoln is posting on our forum?

Honest!

Well, ok, but I thought you were talking about this guy...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Check the logs. It's Lincoln.

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

To what?

If he had reposted the original post, you would know.

I know, right?

Right!

Maybe he agrees with the meaning of life, the universe, and everything?

I know I do.

Well, who doesn't?

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

WildBill wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

To what?

If he had reposted the original post, you would know.

I know, right?

Right!

Maybe he agrees with the meaning of life, the universe, and everything?

03Lightningrocks wrote:

Tic Tac wrote:

Abraham wrote:Why do this?

Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.

Rant off.

I hardly ever see people reposting others' stuff on a different forum but I agree that could muddly the waters without the context.

Many threads get into several discussions that have little to do with each other. It then becomes necessary to copy which post or series of posts one is responding to. What if it was a thread where one of the forum libtards were responding about how much they like licking sweat off obamas feet? Posting ,without posting who I was agreeing to, might cause the forum libtard to think we needed two servings of obama foot sweat.

03Lightningrocks wrote:

RogueUSMC wrote:you suppose ta be repose...lak dis

gringo pistolero wrote:Was HU a flight attendant? viewtopic.php?f=83&t=67639" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

03Lightningrocks wrote:

RogueUSMC wrote: It's HU that is on first...

In before da lock.

03Lightningrocks wrote:

jmra wrote:

fishman wrote:

03Lightningrocks wrote:

fishman wrote:

jmra wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Silliness, just plain silliness! Business must be slow....or something?

Maybe this is the problem?
[youtube][/youtube]

I'm an old country boy, but I enjoyed that, especially with the orchestra playing too. Haven't seen that one before.

I don't know about everyone else...I am busy but still...

[youtube][/youtube]

Got any Eagles?Yep
[youtube][/youtube]

[youtube][/youtube]

Fixed that for you.

Oldgringo wrote:Silliness, just plain silliness! Business must be slow....or something?

fishman wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:

fishman wrote:In, and Wait a minute, what am I agreeing to?

You should'a quoted it…

Ok like this?

03Lightningrocks wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.

If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.

I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.

Why do this?

Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.

Rant off.

Gentlemen, we need to get back on track and answer the OP. . . . . .

. . . . .like this. . . . .