The questions were "written" on the tv (power point). We each answered each question correctly. That was his argument anyway.dogflight wrote:[Making sure my soapbox is nice and sturdy...]
If we're actually talking about a Texas CHL class here, you might refer the instructor to page 17 of the CHL-16:Add in DPS policy that 70% is a passing score on the written exam, it's hard to understand the instructors belief that there are no rules about how the test is to be administered.Sec. 411.188. HANDGUN PROFICIENCY REQUIREMENT.
(d) Only a qualified handgun instructor may administer the proficiency examination to obtain or to renew a license. The proficiency examination must include:
(1) a written section on the subjects listed in Subsection (b); and
(2) a physical demonstration of proficiency...
Frighteningly for you and the others, it might even be argued that the license of anyone "tested" that way is not valid because they didn't actually demonstrate their proficiency.
[Clambering down from soapbox now.]
I'm not at all worried about my CHL getting yanked. I've seen a lot worse violations reported without the student being affected. I'm just thankful I'm done with the classes and don't have to worry about some idiot of an instructor screwing stuff up.
Glad all you guys do a bang up job. The industry needs more like you.