I don't suggest reading this before you've had that first cup of coffee.Andrew wrote:http://www.nhccs.org/dfc-0820.txt 20 August 1787 convention notes.
Search found 3 matches
- Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:50 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Treaty Too Quiet
- Replies: 47
- Views: 7422
Re: Treaty Too Quiet
- Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:05 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Treaty Too Quiet
- Replies: 47
- Views: 7422
Re: Treaty Too Quiet
Sure got quiet in here. Kinda like the treaty.Keith B wrote:If you can't discuss things civily, then don't discuss them.
- Thu Feb 07, 2013 6:25 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Treaty Too Quiet
- Replies: 47
- Views: 7422
Re: Treaty Too Quiet
The Annoyed Man wrote:I don't care what he does....I'm not wearing any rouge.tommyg wrote:The Obama administration has been too quiet about the Dreaded UN treaty on small arms. The treaty is coming back
for discussion at the United Nations next month. Obama does not want to take our guns away.. He wants to set it
up for the United Nations to take them then Obama can say that international law takes precedence over the constitution.
Now Obama did not violate the Constitution he just followed international Law. By following international Law Obama
can save our country from being declared a rouge nation by the U.N. The Constitution and all the rights it gives us will be history
Obama can't do squat without 67 senators voting to ratify the treaty. They can't even get 51 senators to pass an AWB. They won't be getting 67 to ratify a treaty giving the U.N. sovereignty over U.S. gun rights. They'd never get the chance to complete their terms in off office before Senators who voted for it started turning up with lower than normal body temperatures.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7824f/7824f0ea3df4a97d9b04cc91a6c32f49be551c28" alt="I Agree :iagree:"
I thought most of them were cold blooded anyway.