Search found 2 matches

by barres
Thu May 28, 2009 10:03 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: National Park Carry Bill Passed
Replies: 32
Views: 4497

Re: National Park Carry Bill Passed

boomerang wrote:
Liberty wrote:From what I can tell, all they have to do at the parks is to post a 30.06 on any of the buildings. I believe the 30.06 posting in the Texas Park buildings would be legal.
Depends what you mean by legal. 30.06 says
It is an exception to the application of this section that the property on which the license holder carries a handgun is owned or leased by a governmental entity and is not a premises or other place on which the license holder is prohibited from carrying the handgun under Section 46.03 or 46.035.
I don't remember where, but Texas law defines a governmental entity as a state, county, or municipality, or their subdivisions, IIRC. The Federal government is left off of that list. :roll:
by barres
Fri May 22, 2009 12:53 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: National Park Carry Bill Passed
Replies: 32
Views: 4497

Re: National Park Carry Bill Passed

Locksmith wrote:
This says they cannot prohibit in a NPS unit. Does this mean I can also carry inside a building in the park if the state says its ok to?
I believe the way it works is: If there is no law saying you that "CAN NOT DO IT"... Then you can do it.
But state laws don't override Federal laws, and there is already a law in the Federal Codes prohibiting carrying a firearm into buildings where Federal employees work. I wouldn't count on being able to carry in the buildings, yet. Maybe things will be cleared up before Feb 10th. As always, IANAL, IMHO, YMMV, etc.

Return to “National Park Carry Bill Passed”