I don't know if there is a P220 Carry in single action yet. But such a weapon would present the same issues you have with a 1911. Flintknapper posted an excellent explanation of why "cocked-n-locked" carry isn't as much of a problem as many of us think it is.Diode wrote: Is that the P220 "Carry"? I plan on looking at it at the gun show. I still like the P245 idea too. Someone told me the P245 frame is the same size as the P239 so if I cant find a 245 to fondle I will try it.
I can still argue there are some serious advantages to Glock's and other trigger cocking pistols. DA/SA, DAO, and other trigger-cocking systems like the Glock offer more control for those who haven't spent a great deal of time developing trigger control and trigger discipline.
As for the P245 grip being similar to the P239, I can't agree with that. The P239 is indeed a small framed gun but it's grip doesn't feel quite as truncated as a P245. The 239 is still controllable and comfortable to shoot. It suits those with small hands, particularly women, very well.
The P245 to me, is a bad execution of a good idea. Shaving off a fraction of an inch from the P220 is a good idea. The P220 Carry is a step in the right direction but it retains a full length grip, which is what usually "prints" when carrying a full-size handgun. So I find the P220 Carry model, offers almost no advantage over a standard 220 for carry use. I don't find it to be that much lighter than a regular 220 and the shorter slide length and shorter stroke to me made the gun feel choppy in operation. So as I've looked at buying a new Sig myself. the standard size 220 is all I'm considering. It's just a question of whether I'll go for a 220 single-action first or go for a 220DAK.