TexasCHLforum.com

I think that everyone that voted on this issue, all have valid reasons to support their choice of preference. No matter how each one of us chooses to vote, our choice of support, will not be agreed by everyone. I think we all agree that more Government control, on what we can or can't do, is not what we want. However in all societies there must be a common Foundation that can serve as a guide for all citizens to abide by.We have the Constitution and Bill of Rights that are intended to guide and protect EVERY citizen's rights and that includes even Bad Guys. Since bad guys are determined to to act against society, we allow laws to be created to separate the bad guys from responsible citizens. We assume that laws, policies, and rules are created to protect responsible citizens, and they should.The right to drive a vehicle requires knowledge of rules and regulations(written test) plus proving we know how to drive in order to avoid harm to the innocent. For that, we are issued a Driver's License as proof we understand the responsibilities of right to drive. School students must show a Diploma as proof of high school education to continue University Ed.and thus be able to become Teachers to educate future generations. This requirements were intended to better our Society,and before we know it, they become laws.Some agree it's necessary, some don't. Their purpose were intended for the good of responsible citizens.Now CHLs holders must prove knowledge of Gun Laws, responsibilities and ability to handle and shoot a firearm via test, and as proof, we are issued a CHL.We must try to understand the pros n cons and consequences of laws, policies, restrictions and requirements that govern our society hopefully for the best outcome and safety of all good citizens. In conclusion, is open-carry, licensed or unlicensed best for our society? Should we not require restrictions? Should the right to carry in whatever form be also the same right for Bad Guys? Shouldn't there be a distinction between who can and can't carry without a violation to the 2A? As much as I dislike government infringing on my rights, I have to admit that when it comes to the safety of citizens, I will accept, in lieu of bad guys lawless acts.(I apologize for abuse of space and all offended for excessive wording and to those who may think I made no sense)