The city is the only one listed as owning any acreage at that address, so it seems that the city is the landowner at the very least. That brings us back to the ongoing dispute about whether the city owning the land makes any prohibition by owners of improvements on that property invalid under §30.06(e). FWIW, I think it does since the statute differentiates between "property" and "premises," and ownership of the property by a governmental entity is what renders the notice invalid.austinrealtor wrote:EDITED TO ADD:
I was curious enough to do a quick check. Wikipedia (for what it's worth) says the stadium is owned by City of Round Rock
When you look up the address 3400 E. Palm Valley Blvd. (actually search only 3400 Palm Valley because of search engine bugs) on the Williamson County Appraisal District web site it comes back with NINE different owners (including city of Round Rock twice)
http://www.wcad.org/appraisal/publicacc ... sults.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
So who knows? Obviously the city owns a huge chunk of that real estate, but which chunk? And how does that apply to the exception found in PC 30.06(e)?
Sec. 30.06. TRESPASS BY HOLDER OF LICENSE TO CARRY CONCEALED HANDGUN.
(e) It is an exception to the application of this section that the property on which the license holder carries a handgun is owned or leased by a governmental entity and is not a premises or other place on which the license holder is prohibited from carrying the handgun under Section 46.03 or 46.035.