Search found 4 matches

by Crossfire
Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:46 pm
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: CHL and the house call..
Replies: 99
Views: 20318

I think it's time to introduce the "rule of 3". :roll:

1. You make your point.

2. You get to rebut an objection.

3. One last chance to rebut the rebuttal.

That's IT! After 3 times, we don't want to hear from you about this again!

No more :deadhorse:
by Crossfire
Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:28 pm
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: CHL and the house call..
Replies: 99
Views: 20318

Right2Carry,

I, too, think it is ironic that your handle, your signature, and your views are in such wide disagreement.

But, beside that, you have said the same thing over and over and over, and I don't think you have swayed anyone to your side. It's getting tiresome now. Please, let it go.
by Crossfire
Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:28 am
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: CHL and the house call..
Replies: 99
Views: 20318

phddan wrote: Get a sign, give them verbal, or shake in fear. Your choice.

Dan
Good one, Dan! I love it! :smilelol5:
by Crossfire
Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:41 am
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: CHL and the house call..
Replies: 99
Views: 20318

BrassMonkey wrote:Exactly, if they are properly concealing, I would never know.

And yes, if they have a CHL they ARE exactly who I would want around. Just not with a firearm when my son is home.

And I agree with you, their "verbal" is my, "Leave"

And for the record, I think every non criminal should be allowed to carry. And it should be a heck of a lot simpler and less time consuming to get a license. If it should even be licensed. It should all be handled at the local level, as in, local town or city. At the very worst, at the County level. Why can;t I go buy me CHL from Academy at the same time I buy my fishing license every year? If should still remain a State mandated "Shall" issue as well. The County takes taxes every yeay from me, why shouldn't someone suggest that it is handled locally? No need to go into great detail on this one as I am just stating my feelings on whether I am the only one I want to carry or not.

Over the last number of months, I have formulated a conclusion based solely on these board posts. It seems from my observations that some CHL holders feel they are a protected class of citizen. They feel and attempt to demonstrate that anyone who infringes on their right to be possesing a firearm on or about their person, by utilizing their right to infringe, such as a homeowner or business owner must be evil. Or support criminals and the like.

Our right to posses a firearm does not trump others rights to not allow it in their home. Your right to religion does not allow you to force religion on others. Our right to free speech does not allow us to infringe on others rights by saying I am going to blow up this plane, whethe ryou mean it or not. Your right to carry a bic lighter walking down the street does not take the TSA's right to confiscate it at the airport. In this case, you have two options, leave, or comply and get on the plane, yes it is perfectly legal to have a bic lighter in your pocket. And umbrellas, same thing. Notice I am referencing harmless inanimate objects here. There is no 1:1 comparison that I can think of for CHL Holder Vs. CHL Holder yet wants to control his home, but there are plenty that come pretty close.
Monkey Boy,

You have been gone for a month or so, and now you come back and resurrect all this old garbage...

Didn't they have any de-caf in India? :nono:

Return to “CHL and the house call..”