Search found 2 matches

by Crossfire
Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:36 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: CHL requirements
Replies: 62
Views: 10065

Re: CHL requirements

mreavis wrote:But it doesn't mean 12 year olds should be carrying guns in middle school or repeat offending violent criminals should be armed.
If more of us good guys carried, then there wouldn't be as many "repeat offending violent criminals".
by Crossfire
Wed Mar 02, 2011 11:56 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: CHL requirements
Replies: 62
Views: 10065

Re: CHL requirements

jtran987 wrote:im just saying there are too many people who have a chl who dont deserve one and regardless of age, regardless of race, gender whatever i believe you need to know how to shoot if you are to carry a gun. regardless people who cant shoot cant shoot, pretty simple, so they need to learn how to shoot and learn with their handicaps if they have some, before they carry.

i still think that we should raise prices because people still take them with no knowledge or experience just because they can. raising the price by like 100 is nothing to most of us who understand the need. but to those who dont and just think it will be fun, it will keep those people away.

yall can scream 2A all you want and im all for it, i just need to toss a bit of common sense in there, if you dont mind all the people who have never shot before in their lives, and can still pass the proficiency test, carrying a gun thats your call, if it were up to me thered be none of that, you either can or cannot shoot
Common sense gun control laws? Isn't that what the Brady campaign is all about?

You know, you don't need to demonstrate proficiency to carry in your car, or keep a gun in your home, or to get a hunting license. I guess you want to take away the rights of those people, as well?

And please explain to me how raising the price so that fewer people can afford the CHL increases the proficiency of those that can?

Return to “CHL requirements”