TexasCHLforum.com

.45mac.40 wrote:Derekhie....

Ya' got me thinking ....
Is there a 1911 club here ... ?...



Mac .45 >>>> .45 >>> > <#>

If there's not...There should be.

.45mac.40 wrote:She's prettier than my ole' girlfriend .... !
Congrats ... !!
Whats the barrel lenght and weight ???
Reason why I'm asking, is .... I have a XD .45 tactical .... carried it awhile, found out, I was getting tired of the size.
Now I daily carry a Kahr CW40 ( Sweet ) But thinking 'bout carrying the XD Big Daddy !
Alot of us here .... bear it out and carry the full size.
Again ... Congrats ...
Mac .45 >>>> .45 >>> >$

Barrel: Length (inches): 4
Steel, match grade
Twist rate (left hand): 16
Weight (ounces) with empty magazine: 35

It's a little heavier than my xdsc but it's thinner and conceals so nice. Oh, and it a 1911.

gemini wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Congratulations, that's a beautiful pistol for sure. It's much prettier than my Kimber Custom Target II or my PT1911.

I guess it's just me but, shouldn't a pistol that costs as much as a Kimber or a PT1911 be flawless out of the box? Really now, if this or any other pistol requires 3-500 rounds for "break-in", why isn't this done at the factory rather than ship out an unsafe product?

Anybody see where I'm going with this?

I see exactly, and the discussion can lead to a extremely long debate. If I have a small issue with a new 1911, I've found it's usually an extractor problem that's easily remedied by tension adjustment. After 150 rounds, if it doesn't function properly, send it back. I personally would not carry a gun that hasn't fired a minimum of 500 consecutive rounds with absolutely no problems.

uvig3: The gun on top looks like a Thompson Contender.

I agree as well. I decided to go ahead and give this Kimber a try even though I've read that some people have had problems with Kimbers out of the box. I just couldn't pass it up. I'm still carrying my xd 40sc till I'm absolutely positive there will be no problems. I'll be putting another 200 or so rounds through it this coming weekend and see how it does.

And uvig3: the gun in question is a Thompson Contender.

Purplehood, I agree that the MDE is pretty pricey but I held some of the other little guns and found the MDE just felt better, more like a real gun, and it is a very accurate shooter as well.

uvig3 wrote: This is my new carry, the Micro Desert Eagle. I bought it Wednesday and shot it Friday 4/9/09 at Top Gun. It has more kick than I expected, but it is very accurate, much better than I expected. It fits very comfortably in my back pocket and I can sit down on it without noticing it. I will have it with me everywhere now, except where it's illegal by 30.06.

I had some jams, but I think it's because it's brand new. I think I had 3 misfeeds out of 50 rounds. Not particularly good.

That is a very good choice. Micro Eagles are very accurate, I bought one last December. They do tend to jam at first but put some more rounds through it and that takes care of itself. Also, the tigger becomes much better after some use. Here's a pic of mine...

Skiprr wrote:Sweet!

What specifically led you to the Raptor over other models? Just curious.

I have a few Kimbers and love 'em all. My only nit is that I wish the ambidextrous safety was an option, not standard. I prefer my carry 1911 have an extended, but not ambi, safety.

From the first time I saw one of the Raptors I knew I just had to have one and coming from the custom shop was a big plus. I agree about the safety and I'm debating on sending it to the custom shop to have that modified.

I picked up my Pro Raptor II today and headed to the range this afternoon. With 150 rounds of various brands down range the Raptor was flawless. I’m very happy with this gun so far and it is very accurate. Looks like it’s going to end up being my new carry gun.







I also have to show some love for my Springer Loaded.