Search found 2 matches
Return to “Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags”
- Fri Feb 20, 2015 3:22 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1845
Re: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
The funny part of this is that having a spare mag in a belt pouch is legal, but duct taping two mags together is not. I wonder if he thinks that accomplishes something.
- Fri Feb 20, 2015 3:20 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
- Replies: 19
- Views: 1845
Re: Proposed US Federal ban of greater than 10 round mags
In the US Capital I am not sure I would refer to it as "damage".rbwhatever1 wrote:Chris Murphy obviously cant count. I'd say the nut was short about 505 rounds.
"Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Thursday touted the bill, which would ban magazines of more than 10 rounds, hours after reports circulated that police had foiled a mass shooting plot aimed at Congress. "Think of the damage that someone could do in the U.S. Capitol with 30 rounds,” he said at a briefing.
I guess I shouldn't say that.