Search found 2 matches
Return to “State Employee says no 30.06 needed???”
- Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:34 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: State Employee says no 30.06 needed???
- Replies: 130
- Views: 20713
Re: State Employee says no 30.06 needed???
But there is a requirement for EXACT sign requirements.
- Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:28 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: State Employee says no 30.06 needed???
- Replies: 130
- Views: 20713
Re: State Employee says no 30.06 needed???
It seems to me that the link between notice and compliance with 30.06 sets up the requirements for the state to legally take action against your license. The property owner cannot take action against your license. For example, Store owner posts a sign that says NO GREEN SHIRTS ALLOWED ON PROPERTY. If I walk in wearing a green shirt am I tresspassing? If the property owner sees me in my green shirt and says nothing, has he effectively modified the posted conditions by accepting my presence in the green shirt? If I wear a green shirt beneath by coat am I in compliance with the owner's requirements or am I in violation? I also think there is no acceptance that private property rights provide supreme power to control all aspects of human behavior. Can I require folks to remove their underwear while in my store? Just opening my doors to the public creates some conditions that I should expect to tolerate as a property owner. If I operate a store and someone steals from me can I pursue trespass charges against them. Clearly I do not want thieves as customers, sign or no sign. Bottom line, I think we spend too much time playing the what if game on this issue.