TexasCHLforum.com

Going on Morgan's show is a lose/lose proposition. He's been just as maniacal, insulting, angry, and rude to many pro-gun guests in the last month.

Jones was right not to follow Morgan's little bread crumb trail. You could tell he was also bolstered by the thought of facing his audience and not shrinking from his bombastic language when in the hot seat.

For a while, it was fun to see Morgan get a taste of his own medicine. On the points, Jones would've won. But in most debates, especially in America, style points are usually as - if not more - important than content.

On style, he lost big. Morgan avoided rabbit trails. Jones should have, too (the 9/11 conspiracy stuff hurt him worse than the yelling and screaming). The "truther" stuff is what Morgan used to mock him later.

If he had played by Morgan's rules, he would've been backed into an apparent trap (from the perspective of the masses). Instead, he fought on his own grounds and lost anyway (from the perspective of the masses).

I could do a better job for our community. Many of you could, too. Mr. Colion Noir could, too. Charles could. But guess what. . . there's a reason we're not being invited onto the show. If we were, and we had a calm disposition like Dershowitz had. . . Morgan wouldn't let us finish our statements.

His logic is flawed, but he's got his script and he's sticking to it.