Ha!CenTex wrote:Regardless of the legal discussion, my concern is for the property owner or manager to be able to control his property in the manner he desires as long as it is not illegal. I know you can not be prosecuted or otherwise have your rights or legal protections imposed on but I believe you should respect the rules or request of the property owners. If you are on my property, I would strongly suggest you do so. (I own and run 200 acres of wildlife conservation land and I have had to educate a person or two that chose to violate my rules.)
My ultimate opinion is that "concealed is concealed". If I go on a property and the owner wants to know what color my underwear is, tough luck. He can make me leave for refusing to show him, or we can have another discussion if he wants to press the issue and try to sneak a peak.
Regrettably, the legislature decided to give property the owners the chance to govern the color of somebody's underwear through the 30.06 law. Thankfully, they were very specific and detailed in defining the owner's ability to do so. The only legal means of seeing into my britches and controlling what I do is through the exact steps enumerated in the law.
If the owner doesn't follow the law, I'll wear whatever color I want.
Maybe the Perot Museum should worry less about what color my underwear is and more about making sure their guests leave with all of the body parts they had when they entered:
http://www.wfaa.com/news/local/dallas/M ... 16981.html