It just leads to a lot of misunderstanding.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Who's for less Prohibited places?”
- Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:30 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Who's for less Prohibited places?
- Replies: 71
- Views: 5130
Re: Who's for less Prohibited places?
Amen to THAT. :)
It just leads to a lot of misunderstanding.
It just leads to a lot of misunderstanding.
- Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:20 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Who's for less Prohibited places?
- Replies: 71
- Views: 5130
Re: Who's for less Prohibited places?
That's stupid. I figured it was something like that, but that's stupid. Why not just REMOVE the clauses that don't apply?
- Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:17 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Who's for less Prohibited places?
- Replies: 71
- Views: 5130
Re: Who's for less Prohibited places?
I'm TOTALLY confused. The way I'm reading that, B4, B5, B6 and C all have to be properly posted 30.06, is that what I'm understanding? If that's the case, why are they even listed?