His assumption of their intent is the discussion. We'll never know what their intent was. We'll also never know if his actions saved them or if the outcome would have been the same if he'd have done nothing.Dragonfighter wrote: Haven't we already explored this? When you have to insert assumption not in evidence it becomes a "red herring" detracting from the discussion at hand.
I thought I should add a disclaimer since some people read emotion into things on the net. I'm enjoying the discussion and all my statements are based on the original post before he pointed out that they started out on the other side of the street.