It doesn't.Charles L. Cotton wrote:"Pandemonium?" You asked Keith about two signs and he explained (quite well) why the Texas Legislature won't require property owners to post two signs. How does his position suggest "pandemonium" in Texas?johnferg69 wrote:Well the newest state to go open carry is Oklahoma. We'll see how much pandemonium ensues.Keith B wrote:I just believe that the legialature would feel the sign needed to be more visible than a gun buster sign and would say 'We already have a sign, so just modify it to prevent any carry.' Then those businesses who today don't really know people are carrying would then post signs to prevent open carry and the single sign would prevent concealed carry too. It's the old adage, out of sight, out of mind. When people started open carrying I can garuntee you would see a new crop of signs go up.
Chas.
He was speaking of pandemonium in Oklahoma (which isn't going to happen) and it was clearly meant as sarcasm...not a challenge to Keith's post.