In my opinion...this would only serve to further erode our 1st amendment rights by lending credence to the idea that either party did anything wrong.austinrealtor wrote:Do you have a reference to the Dems' 2004 map? I'd love to use it in some Facebook tit-for-tats I'm engaged in.The Annoyed Man wrote:In 2004, the democrats used bullseyes on their political maps to indicate republicans they wanted to take down.... But that was OK.
But when a republican uses crosshairs instead of bullseyes, that's dangerous and irresponsible. Please.
The kind of hyper-sensitivity displayed over what was clearly meant (by BOTH parties) to be a FIGURATIVE symbol is just crazy. There was nothing onerous about either the bulls-eyes or cross-hairs, they are simply widely recognized symbols used to call attention to "targeted" concerns.
How anyone could spin this into meaning it was a HIT LIST is beyond me..... and tells me we have in Washington...a certain number of people, despicable in their nature.
When will the voting public learn? Elections have consequences!