TexasCHLforum.com

03Lightningrocks wrote:
Speaking of pit bulls. I don't guess i will ever understand your line of thinking. You were ready to hang a cop who shoots a dog that is threatening his child, but here you are defending a guy who pulled his weapon on a human being that simply gave him a push.

If accurate, it is a sad commentary...and begs the question: If this man can not control his emotions concerning a soccer game, then how can he be expected to act appropriately when deciding to use (or not use) deadly force.

Time for him to "grow up".

If it turns out he was in the wrong, then other CHL holders should roundly condemn his actions. We must police our own, there is no room in the CHL community for "Hot Heads" .

03Lightningrocks wrote:

KBCraig wrote:

flintknapper wrote:I'm just glad there wasn't a PitBull involved.

Would it be a pit bull with lipstick?

Speaking of pit bulls. I don't guess i will ever understand your line of thinking. You were ready to hang a cop who shoots a dog that is threatening his child, but here you are defending a guy who pulled his weapon on a human being that simply gave him a push.

KBCraig wrote:

flintknapper wrote:I'm just glad there wasn't a PitBull involved.

Would it be a pit bull with lipstick?

Sexism is as sexism does. When men try to "protect" women because they think we're not able to verbally defend ourselves from a loudmouth, that's sexist. When men try to "protect" women because they think we're too weak or incompetent to serve in the military or drive a truck or use power tools or change a tire, that's sexist. When men try to "protect" women because they think we're not smart enough to be a doctor or a lawyer or a computer programmer or a CEO, that's sexist. When men treat women like children instead of adults, that's sexist.

Keith B wrote:If the report is accurate, is sounds like he started the issue and then escalated the situation with the husband. Not a smart move and gives CHL holders a black eye.