airmotive wrote:The reason I posted this originally is this. I have two rescue greyhounds - one a 12 year old lady, the other a 2 year old pup. Neither dog has a mean bone in their body. Neither dog has been around an aggressive dog or have been attacked. Both dogs would be helpless if attacked. Lastly, greyhounds are not very tollerant of physical injury and what would be a serious bite on a lab would be a fatal wound on a grey.
That said, I would confront an aggressive dog verbally, loudly and aggressively. If he continued to approach....zero tollerance.
Am I obligated to wait for him to get my greyhound by the throat?
I am going to ask the next Roanoke LEO I meet. I'll post the answer.
Hi A-M,
This subject has been discussed here in good detail in the past.
If you search, you may find some information that will prove beneficial to you.
Shooting a dog that is a threat (or potential threat) to your pet only (and not yourself) is kinda dicey business per the law.
You are well protected under the law as concerns defending yourself or livestock, but pets kinda get overlooked.
Since you are dog lover (me too ) and spend some time around them, perhaps you are already familiar with the "body language" of an aggressive canine.
Knowing what to look for might help you avoid an attack on your dog or own person.
As I said in my earlier post, I can easily see a situation where "shooting" a dog might be appropriate, but most encounters can be ended without the need for lethal force.
IMO, good quality pepper spray and a cane will serve you better than your gun most times.
Asking your local LEO about this... will most likely yield you his "opinion" more than fact based law.
But, since that is who you will ultimately have to deal with if you discharge your weapon, it couldn't hurt to know his/her position.