TexasCHLforum.com

AJSully421 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 6:12 pm

carlson1 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:52 pm If you have violated no law other than a Class C misdemeanor traffic law I wished Texas would change the part of disarming unless the LEO can show he had some thought of a threat on your part other than a holstered weapon.
We all know the more you handle a firearm the more chances of having a ND.

Read TXGC 411.207 and tell me what you think it means?

officer reasonably believes it is necessary for the protection of the license holder, officer, or another individual.

I understand the reading, but the problem is there is not an action just a “belief” and that could be because he was a biker with tattoos. :)

If you have violated no law other than a Class C misdemeanor traffic law I wished Texas would change the part of disarming unless the LEO can show he had some thought of a threat on your part other than a holstered weapon.
We all know the more you handle a firearm the more chances of having a ND.

I watched that same episode and my answer would have been "No sir I don't consent to you running my firearm." Now with that being said he has the right to disarm me and then I guess he gets to do what he wants then.

I am a legal law abiding citizen. I am not consenting to any searches, etc... I have zero to hide, but the answer is still no sir.