I'll rephrase my quality bash, I think the fit and finish leave quite a bit to be desired.Dave2 wrote:Dunno about all Kel-Tecs... AFAIK (and FWIW) nutnfancy loves his PF9. The PMR did seem have a lot of feeding issues early on. I don't know if they've fixed it yet, or maybe that model just has a long break-in period. To the best of my knowledge, nobody has any quality issues with Kel-Tec's RFB.RECIT wrote:After three pages of comments does anyone else carry one of these fine pistols and does anyone have any pics of IWB or OWB carry? I too love this gun and its potential, but the cost of ammo keeps my wants from turning to needs I guess.
I can also see reasons one would choose this pistol for its capacity, kinetic energy from the round, and the quality of the firearm. I think the PMR only has capacity on its side. The quality of most Kel-tec firearms leave a lot to be desired in my opinion. The rounds are similar in velocity and size, but I think the 5.7 is light years ahead of the .22mag as far as bullet performance once a target is struck and is a viable self defense round.
Search found 2 matches
- Fri Dec 23, 2011 7:01 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: FN Five Seven
- Replies: 48
- Views: 9890
Re: FN Five Seven
- Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:35 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: FN Five Seven
- Replies: 48
- Views: 9890
Re: FN Five Seven
After three pages of comments does anyone else carry one of these fine pistols and does anyone have any pics of IWB or OWB carry? I too love this gun and its potential, but the cost of ammo keeps my wants from turning to needs I guess.
I can also see reasons one would choose this pistol for its capacity, kinetic energy from the round, and the quality of the firearm. I think the PMR only has capacity on its side. The quality of most Kel-tec firearms leave a lot to be desired in my opinion. The rounds are similar in velocity and size, but I think the 5.7 is light years ahead of the .22mag as far as bullet performance once a target is struck and is a viable self defense round.
I can also see reasons one would choose this pistol for its capacity, kinetic energy from the round, and the quality of the firearm. I think the PMR only has capacity on its side. The quality of most Kel-tec firearms leave a lot to be desired in my opinion. The rounds are similar in velocity and size, but I think the 5.7 is light years ahead of the .22mag as far as bullet performance once a target is struck and is a viable self defense round.