With respect, the GOP appointments are likely to be better than the democrat ones. Being a purist or protest voter in a general election is the worst thing to do. It will elect Hillary Clinton, who will appoint more SCOTUS justices.anygunanywhere wrote:All those GOP appointments worked out so well.J.R.@A&M wrote:As others have observed before, elections matter. President Obama has had a SCOTUS appointment in each term. McCain and Romney failed to get a lot of conservative votes in the general elections of 2008 and 2012, resp. In Romney's case, this may have made the difference. As a result, we have Kagan on the SCOTUS. Lay the blame where it partially belongs.
The GOP will save us!
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Current SCOTUS may not be reliable on next 2d am case”
- Wed Jul 01, 2015 4:55 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Current SCOTUS may not be reliable on next 2d am case
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2826
Re: Current SCOTUS may not be reliable on next 2d am case
- Tue Jun 30, 2015 2:13 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Current SCOTUS may not be reliable on next 2d am case
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2826
Re: Current SCOTUS may not be reliable on next 2d am case
As others have observed before, elections matter. President Obama has had a SCOTUS appointment in each term. McCain and Romney failed to get a lot of conservative votes in the general elections of 2008 and 2012, resp. In Romney's case, this may have made the difference. As a result, we have Kagan on the SCOTUS. Lay the blame where it partially belongs.