That's ok. I reverted to Prosilver and will continue to use that.
For my own method of reading posts, subsilver is a step backward.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “subsilver question”
- Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:14 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: subsilver question
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1423
- Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:15 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: subsilver question
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1423
subsilver question
The recent discussion about rankings appearing on the member list only in subsilver caused me to take another look.
I don't find subsilver as objectionable now as when it was first introduced, but it's still a change. I don't like any change and it takes great effort to adapt.
My habit is to read 'New Posts', but I always start at the bottom of the last page and read bottom to top. I do this so that any messages updated while I'm reading are waiting for me when I get to the beginning.
It's not a big thing, but why are the only page locators at the bottom of the pages? When I reach the top of the page, I have to return to the bottom to change pages.
Could the page numbers not also appear at the top of the pages?
I don't find subsilver as objectionable now as when it was first introduced, but it's still a change. I don't like any change and it takes great effort to adapt.
My habit is to read 'New Posts', but I always start at the bottom of the last page and read bottom to top. I do this so that any messages updated while I'm reading are waiting for me when I get to the beginning.
It's not a big thing, but why are the only page locators at the bottom of the pages? When I reach the top of the page, I have to return to the bottom to change pages.
Could the page numbers not also appear at the top of the pages?