This thread was beaten to death many times on the old Packing.org.
You either believe the 'lawful purposes' exemption or you don't.
I choose to believe it and base my decision accordingly.
Search found 3 matches
- Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:03 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Post Office carry
- Replies: 79
- Views: 10419
- Mon Jul 28, 2008 4:45 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Post Office carry
- Replies: 79
- Views: 10419
Re: Post Office carry
Nope. I read that before making my post.
- Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:53 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Post Office carry
- Replies: 79
- Views: 10419
Re: Post Office carry
If the 'law' or 'rule' were actually practical, allowing the firearm to remain in the parked vehicle, I might adhere.
But if I'm going to be in violation anyway, then my carry will remain concealed, ON ME, inside the post office.
Besides, I have always believed the 'lawful purposes' exemption and continue to do so.
IANAL, but isn't it true the CFR codes do not have force of law unless reciprocated in the USC?
If so, I think the $50 fine is correct but I do not agree with the 30 day possible jail sentence.
But if I'm going to be in violation anyway, then my carry will remain concealed, ON ME, inside the post office.
Besides, I have always believed the 'lawful purposes' exemption and continue to do so.
IANAL, but isn't it true the CFR codes do not have force of law unless reciprocated in the USC?
If so, I think the $50 fine is correct but I do not agree with the 30 day possible jail sentence.