I suppose I should have clarified that those I had the debates with were not reasonable people. They are the ones who's vocabulary only consists of "shall not be infringed".Jumping Frog wrote: That is not consistent with the conversations and discussions I have personally seen from other states. Most reasonable people agree if a police officer is dispatched in response to a MWAG call, the police should proceed to the location.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “An honest response from a local LEO (HB910)”
- Wed May 20, 2015 4:59 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: An honest response from a local LEO (HB910)
- Replies: 43
- Views: 6314
Re: An honest response from a local LEO (HB910)
- Tue May 19, 2015 4:35 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: An honest response from a local LEO (HB910)
- Replies: 43
- Views: 6314
Re: An honest response from a local LEO (HB910)
Having been in debates with people from OC states about MWAG calls/responses, the highlighted part is something I can never get them to understand. They seem to think that as long as OC is legal, that LEOs should never respond to any MWAG call unless shots have already been fired.cb1000rider wrote:And I agree with having dispatch educate the public, but I also promise you that LEOs will respond to a MWAG call, even a legal MWAG call - as the political ramifications of not responding and have something "bad" happen are significant to leadership...