TexasCHLforum.com

sometime next week

WOW, this is the first time I see the cell photo. Who in his own right mind, put someone under 24 hrs in a cell with a bunker bed? With holes in the frame of said bunker and tons of bed sheets?
Regardless, the story of suicide is implausible. The first who walked in the scene, who was he? Why the scene was not photographed? Why it was not considered as a crime scene?

Archery1 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2019 9:28 am

Rob72 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 11:09 am A will may make it more difficult to find evidence and pursue charges. Dying intestate would allow prosecutors to freeze and seize. The will, with numerous beneficiaries. means that persons will have to be identified for subpoena. Even if it appears that Epstein was the sole proprietor, who incorporated without partners, that would have to be validated before search warrants could be issued. Prosecutors would want to have the ducks particularly lined up to pursue a case like this, preferably expediently, and the will creates multiple hurdles.

Whomever goes after Epstein assets needs an estate opened either way in order to sue, testate or intestate. As for other entities, corporations or other players, they have no probate matter to settle.

All assets would be registered offshore for protection.

Epstien was removed from 24hrs suicide watch by his lawyer request. [really? When was that honored anyway?]
Cellmate was removed from the cell. [Why? who took this decision? no substitute cellmate was assigned to the cell]
"Guards" were filing in and they are not on duty
"Guards" did not do the 30mins check ins
"Bed sheet" was used as suicide tool. [Under suicide watch, no cloth of any kind is provided. Only "paper cloths" are provided]

Why the cell was not under 24hr video monitoring?

If Khashegshi assassination was a bad hit. Epstien "suicide" was even worse.

The writings were on the wall in that same cell.

https://nypost.com/2019/08/10/convicted ... w2FxS8PRS4