Search found 4 matches

by Beiruty
Fri May 29, 2015 10:50 am
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: HB 910 Conference Committee
Replies: 518
Views: 136958

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

jimlongley wrote:
Beiruty wrote:
They removed the amendment, which makes sense to me, because that amendment is not needed anyway. There are already laws in place that require LEOs to have a reason before asking to see your CHL.
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/D" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... /CR.14.htm
As it is a crime to open carry a sidearm without a CHL, the mere observation of person with a holster handgun is an articulated suspicion for LEO to stop the suspect and check his CHL.
I feel exactly the opposite. Absent any reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is taking place, open carry in and of itself must be treated as not criminal and does not justify a stop to check CHL, just as it is not an articulated suspicion that anyone driving a car is doing so without a license.
Defense Lawyer: Why you do not stop everyone who is driving to check his license while you did stop the defendant to check his CHL?
LEO to the Defense Lawyer: 95% of drivers do have valid Driving License while driving. 95% of the people do NOT have a CHL and may want to OC.

If the Amendment is NOT needed legally, why the PDs and many Reps/Senators are against it?
by Beiruty
Fri May 29, 2015 10:16 am
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: HB 910 Conference Committee
Replies: 518
Views: 136958

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

They removed the amendment, which makes sense to me, because that amendment is not needed anyway. There are already laws in place that require LEOs to have a reason before asking to see your CHL.
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/D" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... /CR.14.htm
As it is a crime to open carry a sidearm without a CHL, the mere observation of person with a holster handgun is an articulated suspicion for LEO to stop the suspect and check his CHL.
by Beiruty
Thu May 28, 2015 4:22 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: HB 910 Conference Committee
Replies: 518
Views: 136958

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

Isn't it if they agreed, It is up/down vote no further debate. Also, as they did on SB 11, 25 vote and end of debates.
by Beiruty
Thu May 28, 2015 7:19 am
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: HB 910 Conference Committee
Replies: 518
Views: 136958

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

In Any case, all this circus tactics are uncalled for. The house should have voted yes and done with it. It is ridiculous to vote no for A couple words difference in text. This means that the House Amendment was a poison pill by the Republican House. After all, we are not that stupid.

Disgusting!

Return to “HB 910 Conference Committee”