Search found 4 matches
Return to “MISTRIAL/CONVICTION: Ft. Hood soldier's case to carry AR15”
- Sun Nov 24, 2013 7:30 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: MISTRIAL/CONVICTION: Ft. Hood soldier's case to carry AR15
- Replies: 135
- Views: 11964
Re: MISTRIAL/CONVICTION: Ft. Hood soldier's case to carry AR
I recommed to lock it up. There is nothing worth discussing after the conviction. If the appeal is successful then it is time for another thread.
- Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:38 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: MISTRIAL/CONVICTION: Ft. Hood soldier's case to carry AR15
- Replies: 135
- Views: 11964
Re: MISTRIAL in Ft. Hood soldier's case for carrying AR15
What I would like to see in Texas and specifically due to detaining of OC is to amend the disorderly conduct by displaying a firearm or repeal it all together. Pointing a firearm unjustifiably at someone is already considered an assault. Moreover, the legislator can introduce a language to clarify when an OC could be detained/disarmed.
- Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:28 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: MISTRIAL/CONVICTION: Ft. Hood soldier's case to carry AR15
- Replies: 135
- Views: 11964
Re: MISTRIAL in Ft. Hood soldier's case for carrying AR15
Good, As I am not a legal expert in detention/arrest business of LEOs. So we agree, that we need to see what is the RS was.EEllis wrote:I think you are making it too complicated. If he appeals challenging the RS for the stop that's all he needs. Legally speaking it does not matter if Grisham committed a crime or not. It only matters if the officer had RS for a stop. If he had RS then he can legally disarm Grisham regardless as to any crime having been committed. A police officer doesn't have to be omnipotent, just have RS.Beiruty wrote:The defendant would appeal as not to loose his CHL. The crux of the issue is that the defendant never committed a crime before the stop and disarming him violates his 4thA. How the defendant would know what LEO duty he was interfering with?
I can legally walk with a chain-saw out of Home Depot. Is there RS to be stopped and detained, if someone called me in and said; "There is a man with a chain-saw leaving Home Depot. Go check him out"
- Sat Nov 23, 2013 3:11 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: MISTRIAL/CONVICTION: Ft. Hood soldier's case to carry AR15
- Replies: 135
- Views: 11964
Re: MISTRIAL in Ft. Hood soldier's case for carrying AR15
The defendant would appeal as not to loose his CHL. The crux of the issue is that the defendant never committed a crime before the stop and disarming him violates his 4thA. How the defendant would know what LEO duty he was interfering with?