I guess, the defense attorney would have to show that the shooter was acquitted in court of law, not my word or your word, but is real court of law. The Jury found the defended not guilty and justifed. I guess this a good start to show under TX law that the defended is protected from civil liability.
But as noted above, your mileage my vary.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Disparity of Force: Four v three+.380”
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:28 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Disparity of Force: Four v three+.380
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2450
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:13 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Disparity of Force: Four v three+.380
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2450
Re: Disparity of Force: Four v three+.380
The DA was aggressive and dropped more than 1/2 of the charges. A group of 4 following and trying to assult others with no provocation? 
The others tried to keep walk and leave the scene and they were followed? Bad things will follow. Was Ung drunk or had a lot of it, was it a factor?
Also Ung was lucky since no deadly weapon was deployed by his attackers.
There is a civil case coming. We are lucky in Texas cases of shooters in self-defense are protected from civil liability.
The others tried to keep walk and leave the scene and they were followed? Bad things will follow. Was Ung drunk or had a lot of it, was it a factor?Also Ung was lucky since no deadly weapon was deployed by his attackers.
There is a civil case coming. We are lucky in Texas cases of shooters in self-defense are protected from civil liability.