TexasCHLforum.com

Thanks for all the terrific (positive and negative) feedback folks! If I summarize, sounds like no one's really had a problem with the reliability of the Ruger P-series, and they are inexpensive, but main complaints are a) looks/weight or b) Mr. Ruger (forget his first name), who is by the way no longer there. Also many quietly satisfied owners out there.

The trigger in SA mode is WAY better than my Sigma .40, and probably even a bit better in DA. Shoots accurately, and I like the chunky looks. In addition, the size is not really a factor for someone who's only gonna carry in the car or in the house, and it doesn't seem that much larger than the Sigma to me (not that the Sigma's a tiny gun or anything). Glad to hear that no one really has had problems with them, as that confirms that my current issues are most likely with the operator, and may also improve with more rounds fired.

Thanks again!!!

So, I see tons of guns mentioned on this site, but almost no mention whatsoever of Ruger semi-autos (P-series). Is there something bad about these guns I should know? I'm not a 1911 fan, but the SA/DA option of these pistols allows lots of different possibilities. Have... been involved in family members getting a .40, KP944 and a 9mm, P95. Relatively good price, great functionality on the .40, but have had some problems on the 9mm, which may be at least partially operator-assisted problems. These guns have the nice crisp trigger when in SA mode, as well as the ability to de-cock or put on safety (depending on which version you purchase) providing pretty much any level of safety/readiness you so desire. Even "adjustable" rear sight (allen screw to loosen before tapping sideway). Any reason I haven't heard about that Rugers are to be avoided?

I mean, I shoot a S&W Sigma .40, and I know that's the trailer trash of semi-autos, but it works for me. I understand why no one is talking about that one, but don't understand the lack of Ruger discussion. Any info appreciated.