TexasCHLforum.com

It doesn't matter one way or another, at least to me. Either providing for security is a good idea and is worth it, or it isn't. The same goes for the rest of his proposals. Attack or defend on that. Even a evil moron can have a good idea, just as a genius can be wrong on an issue.

Heven't had a chance to sit down and watch the add all the way through, so feel free to slap me down if what I say isn't accurate.

Seems the NRA is pulling a page from the liberal playbook, and not a good one. It's the page with the heading "Don't bother attacking the arguement, attack the man". I don't think it will work. It preaches to the choir, like us and the majority of gun rights people. May get a few people who were on the fence. Will turn off the block of people who support Obama, but maybe not his take on this (blue dogs, Union types, and those who disagree with everything the liberals do but still vote Democrat "cause their Pappy did").

I just have a harsh opposition to emotional pleas.