Embalmo wrote:Guys,
Okay I'm confused-I assumed that all CHLs would be against restricted carry, but this is the second thread here that I've had to defend it. Am I strange because I believe in defending myself/family 100% of the time, or am I just missing something?
If someone is going to argue the "It's their business they can do what they want" card, then why can't they discriminate based on race, sex, or handicap-no one forced any of them to enter the building; so why would it be such a stretch to require businesses to be required to respect the individual's right to self preservation?
It's not a big deal now because there are very few legal 30.06 signs, but what happens when insurance companies start requiring them and a 30.06 sign becomes the rule instead of the exception.
Embalmo
While I'd hate to speak it, if any and every establishment posted a 30.06 our CHL would be moot.
I hate the 30.06 out. At the same time I believe that every property owner is the king of their castle and it's their rules. I don't want someone coming into my property telling me what to do. There in lies the conflict.
