TexasCHLforum.com

I certainly agree our children need protection in schools. I feel anywhere you're required to be, either legally or by necessity, you should have a legal right to protect yourself. If you're not legally able to carry, I feel it should be required by law that the business or institution provided armed security at a level suitable to the number of occupants on the premises. If adequate funding is not available to provide armed protection, that business or institution should be required to allow legal carry.

That being said - I think the NRA commercial is apples & oranges. The U.S. doesn't negotiate with terrorists - what's the fastest way to test that statement....? Yes, the president's children most certainly need 24/7 armed security - not even a question in most people's mind. The difference is that protection of the president's children is in the interest of our country's national security.