I agree, but in my opinion for employee's (at least) they should make them place 30.06 signs except with more words to make it more annoying ( ) and if it's for employees they must allow for quickly accessible parking.KBCraig wrote:
Just as your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins, your right to do as you wish in or on your property, ends where my property begins. The parking lot owner can ban your car because it's an import, or a low-rider, or a monster truck, or too heavy for his lot, or too wide/long for his parking spaces, or because you've got Aggie plates. Or, because you've got a gun inside.
There's no such thing as "semipublic property". The legal construct of "a place of public accommodation", where owners are allowed little discretion about who enters, is itself an abrogation of property rights.
Property is either owned privately, owned publicly (by the people in common, or by the government), or it's unclaimed property (good luck finding any of that). A store with big flashing signs inviting the public is just as much private property as is your bedroom, and the owner should have just as much right to deny entry to his store, as you do at your home.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Wish list for 2009”
- Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:28 am
- Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: Wish list for 2009
- Replies: 57
- Views: 34118