Search found 2 matches

Return to “Carrying Concealed on a Military base in Oklahoma”

by Purplehood
Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:06 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Carrying Concealed on a Military base in Oklahoma
Replies: 42
Views: 7080

Re: Carrying Concealed on a Military base in Oklahoma

loadedliberal wrote:
Little has changed since March 1993 when Newly anointed President Bill Clinton singed in to law, what effective disarmed Military personnel on military bases.

Why is it with so many of you people cant accept that a Democratic President can be just plain elected. Are memories so short that you dont remember President Bush being "appointed" by way of the Supreme Court. Its comments like that that to me at least wears on the credibility of the person making them. It dosent add anything positive to the discussion . I do agree however that our service member should have the right to carry a weapon on base lie the could almost anywhere else assuming they had a license of course. Fort Hood is a clear example why the laws are nothing but words people can choose to follow or not a person bent on killing many innocent people is not going to care about the gunbuster sign at the front gate,
You did note that it says ANOINTED, not APPOINTED, correct?
by Purplehood
Tue Mar 08, 2011 4:17 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Carrying Concealed on a Military base in Oklahoma
Replies: 42
Views: 7080

Re: Carrying Concealed on a Military base in Oklahoma

There were 50mm cannons, more accurately referred to as a 50mm gun. Lobbing as light a shell as a 50mm would not be highly useful in an artillery piece (cannon).

50mm was a common Anti-Tank gun caliber, though 45mm, 47mm and the like were probably even more prevalent. The Germans put them in Panzer Mk IIIJ's and other Armored Fighting Vehicles.
(Don't forget the 50mm Recoilless Rifle).

Don't take your 50mm on US bases. It is a no-no.

Return to “Carrying Concealed on a Military base in Oklahoma”