Hey, I resent that. I like pool balls.seamusTX wrote:It has been years now (4?) since the civil immunity provision went into effect in Texas. As far as I know, in that time, it never has been exercised or tested in court.
Texas also protects certain assets of individuals from seizure, including the person's homestead, means of livelihood such as tools, two horses, mules, or donkeys, and household pets. It isn't worth suing a person who does not have significant other assets.
That said, I think the notion that "you can't be sued" is dangerous. You can be sued, and the situation is full of legal gray areas and the possibility of getting a jury with the collective IQ of a rack of pool balls.
- Jim
Search found 1 match
Return to “Disparity of Force: Four v three+.380”
- Fri Feb 25, 2011 10:08 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Disparity of Force: Four v three+.380
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2454