Search found 5 matches
Return to “East Austin bunker under home”
- Wed May 09, 2012 3:05 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: East Austin bunker under home
- Replies: 62
- Views: 8714
Re: East Austin bunker under home
Did he ever get his "not confiscated" weapons back?
- Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:49 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: East Austin bunker under home
- Replies: 62
- Views: 8714
Re: East Austin bunker under home
Speaks volumes for the skill level of some of our state employees.KD5NRH wrote:Read it again; they're just saying that government employment makes him an experienced madman.OverEasy wrote: "Mr. Del Rio wasn't a madman with no experience — he was a state employee for years."![]()
I need to get a job with the state, that will prove my sanity, ya think?
- Thu May 20, 2010 6:37 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: East Austin bunker under home
- Replies: 62
- Views: 8714
Re: East Austin bunker under home
The problem with exercising absolute rights and liberties are when they infringe on someone else's. Drawing the line is where conflict arises.Liberty wrote:It Just goes to prove that we really never can own our own property and homes,
- Wed May 19, 2010 9:39 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: East Austin bunker under home
- Replies: 62
- Views: 8714
Re: East Austin bunker under home
AustinRealtor,
Almost everything that I post is pure speculation. Maybe I should work on Wall Street!
Almost everything that I post is pure speculation. Maybe I should work on Wall Street!
- Wed May 19, 2010 6:49 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: East Austin bunker under home
- Replies: 62
- Views: 8714
Re: East Austin bunker under home
Point 1: He did indeed violate building codes. I am sure that digging a 2 to 3 story hole under your house in a residential neighborhood is a violation. In my mind if he was living up on Ruby Ridge with his nearest neighbor being in the next county, it wouldn't be anyones business let alone a code violation.
Point 2: He might have violated hazardous material storage regulations.
Point 3: The Police are storing his weapons while he is unable to enter his residence, and did not confiscate them.
We can all feel free to speculate about the implications of the above points, but as the story currently stands I don't see what the issue really is.
Point 2: He might have violated hazardous material storage regulations.
Point 3: The Police are storing his weapons while he is unable to enter his residence, and did not confiscate them.
We can all feel free to speculate about the implications of the above points, but as the story currently stands I don't see what the issue really is.