I believe that the city of Austin is actually a colony of the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia. That may explain things.Mando'a wrote:Just heard on the newz today that Austin City Council, has decided to not do any business with AZ.
The reporter then said, Austin currently does not do any business with AZ.
I believe it was CNN
Search found 2 matches
Return to “AZ's "new" immigration law”
- Fri May 14, 2010 9:49 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: AZ's "new" immigration law
- Replies: 60
- Views: 6992
Re: AZ's "new" immigration law
- Thu May 13, 2010 7:50 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: AZ's "new" immigration law
- Replies: 60
- Views: 6992
Re: AZ's "new" immigration law
I think that the Mexican government should have posted its own laws regarding the handling and treatment of illegal aliens into their country, though it may have detracted from the impact of their own statement above.Mexico turns the tables
In what could be the ultimate insult, the Mexican government issued a travel warning to Mexicans “visiting, living or studying in the state of Arizona,” mimicking numerous such advisories the U.S. State Department has issued about traveling to Mexico.
The Mexican government — saying the law “violates inalienable human rights protected by international legal provisions and the U.S. Constitution” — sent officials to meet with U.S. groups challenging the law to coordinate “protection and consular assistance” and to provide legal representation for Mexicans in the state, the Foreign Affairs Ministry confirmed. It said Mexico would defend the rights of any Mexican nationals in Arizona, “regardless of their immigration status.”
Though I consider myself vaguely Hispanic (I guess when it is convenient), I know hypocrisy when I see it.