The post regards the FUTURE of Firearms. Of course everything is imaginary! If we didn't have any imagination we wouldn't bother inventing stuff in the first place!seamusTX wrote:The only problem with phasers is that they are completely imaginary.
I can't see lasers or masers (the microwave equivalent of lasers) as practical weapons. Their effect is to create heat. You might set your attacker's clothes on fire or cook him if he stood still long enough, but I doubt they could have the instantaneous effect of a bullet.
Also, battery technology is not up to the chore of powering a portable laser for a long time.
The military has been experimenting with an electromagnetic "pain ray" for years. I doubt it will ever be a personal-defense weapon, for reasons explained in this article: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... v-mads.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
No, in 2010, we are still using 19th and 20th-century technology for the most part.
- Jim
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Future of Firearms”
- Fri Jan 08, 2010 11:24 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Future of Firearms
- Replies: 47
- Views: 6596
Re: Future of Firearms
- Fri Jan 08, 2010 10:36 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Future of Firearms
- Replies: 47
- Views: 6596
Re: Future of Firearms
If the Constitution has not changed by then, Yes. After all, when that document was forged the height of technology were muzzle-loaded weapons.marksiwel wrote:Yeah but do you think they will let US carry a Phaser or even privately own one?joe817 wrote:Perfection of the old Gyrojet technology that never got off the ground, or better yet "phaser pistols & rifles". I see the latter as a real possibility when we gain that technology in the future.
- Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:12 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Future of Firearms
- Replies: 47
- Views: 6596
Re: Future of Firearms
Seriously. Gauss Rifles. Man-portable Rail-guns.