You almost touched on the real issue here...Interpol is an investigative police agency only. It is not an enforcement agency.gwholt1 wrote:The unrestrained investigative multinational police force allowed loose in the USA is a disaster of incalculable proportions. When President Reagan granted the limited provisions for INTERPOL'S operations the bounds of our liberties were seriously encroached. But at least there were some significant limits to their operational latitude, their equipment, premises and most importantly their documentation and document transmission capabilities were subject to inspection and over site. And upon determination of violation of USA laws, regulations, ordinances, administrative rules etc could be examined and even seized. Those limits have been lifted and the organization has now been elevated to the status of a diplomat of a sovereign nation not subject to interdiction, detainment, or accountability to any US authority. They have been given carte blanch to operate on USA soil with impunity. There is no other "law enforcement origination" which has unrestrained and uncountable latitude of operations in our nation! INTERPOL does not have to answer to any US citizen for any activity they may engage in, every other LEO must account to one or more levels of authority, which ultimately means "WE THE PEOPLE". Our forefathers would not recognize the republic which they handed off to their children in this day and time. May God help our nation to come to its senses and gain our balance before we tumble over the precipice.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Why Does Interpol Need Immunity from American Law?”
- Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:05 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Why Does Interpol Need Immunity from American Law?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 4760