I would have to disagree. I personally know "feminists" that are anything but examples of being victims. Did you see anything about Anne Richards that made you think she exhibited a "victim" mentality?bdickens wrote:It would be the ability to acheive everything that so-called "feminists" say they want women to be able to acheive. And without handouts, without "gimmies," without affirmative action but by hard work and determination. By doing so, she gives lie to the idea that the cards are stacked against women in a sexist, patriarchal society.
You see, "feminists" are not really interested in equality; they are too heavily invested in being victims. If they actually acheived their ostensible goals, they wouldn't be victims any more. Their whole identity revolves around being victims.
For a woman to give lie to their manufactured complaints is inexcusable - a sin the punishment for which is death by stoning.
I am simply saying that though I may find Sarah Palin an intriguing woman, I have yet to see any definitive indication that she has any unusual or noteworthy abilities that would make me stand up and take notice of her.