TexasCHLforum.com

anygunanywhere wrote:

Purplehood wrote:

bryang wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Y'all keep it up and once you get rid of Obama and Biden, we'll have Nancy Pelosi as POTUS. Wouldn't that be a fine kettle of fish?

Very wise, Oldgringo, wise indeed. The thought of such a thing as that makes your heart skip a beat and takes your breath away. As the old saying goes....it could be worse!

-geo

With Ann Coulter as her new VP.

I am having trouble understanding your logic here. Please explain. Do you dislike Ann Coulter? I would like to see the remains of Nazi Pelosi once Ann Coulter finished with her.

Anygunanywhere

bryang wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Y'all keep it up and once you get rid of Obama and Biden, we'll have Nancy Pelosi as POTUS. Wouldn't that be a fine kettle of fish?

Very wise, Oldgringo, wise indeed. The thought of such a thing as that makes your heart skip a beat and takes your breath away. As the old saying goes....it could be worse!

-geo

barres wrote:I can't say anything about unemployment funds, but the stimulus package certainly is sucking money from the states into the federal coffers. My wife works in Accounts Payable for a very large state agency, and she has been informed that, due to stipulations in the stimulus package, starting soon (I forget the exact date) any payment to a vendor of over $10,000.00 must have 3% deducted and payed to the feds. Can you imagine how the vendors are going to react when their invoices for hundreds of thousands of dollars are suddenly being paid 3% short?

mr.72 wrote:Well, the citizenship thing is indeed a clear cut issue, either he is a natural born citizen or he is not. However, it is tilting at windmills because there is absolutely no way that the Supreme Court are going to invalidate the election of the first black president over his citizenship status. Nobody in America has the political will to do that. Whomever does will be labeled as a racist and trying to find some minor technicality to throw a black man out of the white house.

This is a case of lose-lose. Either we lose by giving up and concede that Obama doesn't have to prove his citizenship status, or we lose by winning, demonstrating that he is not a natural-born citizen, and then he still doesn't get thrown out of the white house and we all look like a bunch of racists. Better to lose by concession in this case.

mr.72 wrote:

Purplehood wrote: As the resident-liberal on this board, I have to take exception to this statement.

Well you are completely wrong. Are you really suggesting somehow Bush rigged the election when he beat John Kerry in 2004? He won by a 3% margin. Even if you gave all of Nader's votes to Kerry, Bush still won decisively. Or are you still sore over Al Gore's failure to complete a selective recount in FL in 2000?

mr.72 wrote: The rational thing to do is throw out the election results, some body of the government would have to appoint an interim President (perhaps even GWB, the last man to fairly win a valid election), and then hold a new special election in which Obama would be ineligible to run.