mr.72 wrote:Thoughts?
Search found 3 matches
Return to “"Defense of a third party" question”
- Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:40 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: "Defense of a third party" question
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1996
Re: "Defense of a third party" question
- Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:01 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: "Defense of a third party" question
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1996
Re: "Defense of a third party" question
I think the issue is did his brother "provoke" the incident? Based on my limited read, he didn't. If he did, then I agree with you.
BTW, I thought provocation was not a defense?
BTW, I thought provocation was not a defense?
- Tue Sep 09, 2008 2:08 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: "Defense of a third party" question
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1996
Re: "Defense of a third party" question
I would imagine that technically the bad-guy is still the one that instigated the trouble in the first place. If he hadn't, the incident would never have occurred. So based on what limited info you have provided, you are probably justified.
That is just an opinion, of course.
That is just an opinion, of course.