TexasCHLforum.com

As I predicted, more sober analysis is suggesting that no laws were actually broken (remembering that stupidity itself isn't illegal) and he may very well walk when the DA thinks this one over. Details here.

This would make more sense if the guy admitted he was trying to get WalMart to ban carrying guns in its stores.

Even a double face palm doesn't cover it.

From a charging perspective it's likely to end up as either a disorderly conduct or outright dismissal. with a possibility he may try to sue the guy who held him at gunpoint