It took Massachusetts only 7 days to endorse the Boston chief's idea and give Massachusetts police chiefs veto power over citizen purchase of ALL rifles and shotguns. MA state now has the national lead on gun tyranny.
A little thought would reveal that this can't work without full registration because there would otherwise be no way to control private sales. That should logically come next, and we know what comes after that.
The effort didn't quite match the dead of night tactics of New York with its SAFE act, but it sure is close. There couldn't have been much citizen input in that time frame during the summer. This unusually rapid action also suggests that this was a carefully planned and orchestrated event by those in power rather than a random police chief's comment that got picked up by the legislature as a good idea.
One wonders if the states with democrat leadership have a competition going to see who can go full communist first.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “How bad it is in Massachusetts”
- Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:56 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: How bad it is in Massachusetts
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10802
- Sun Jul 27, 2014 8:16 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: How bad it is in Massachusetts
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10802
Re: How bad it is in Massachusetts
On the other hand, the recent actions of many of the state's police chiefs suggest that the drug problem is much worse there than we thought.VMI77 wrote:They must not have a drug problem in Mass, if they do, these guys have a solution....just pass a law that makes drugs illegal. Or, more realistically, a law that gives Police Chiefs discretion as to which people are or are not among the state ruling class, and thus are or are not entitled to use recreational drugs.

They will, of course, need a tax exempt organization to fund their activism. I suggest it be called OODMA (Our Oaths Don't Mean Anything) or, perhaps more accurately, CAL (Cops Against Liberty).