I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think you have much to worry about regarding a civil suit. If the investigating police said you did the right thing which is clearly covered in Texas law, I doubt any lawyer would take a case like the one you described, especially with its neighborhood history, on contingency.skip62 wrote:Jumping Frog wrote:When you consider dealing with the issue of being "at fault", please remember that it is the dog owner's fault. As a dog owner, I have the responsibility to keep my dogs safe and well-cared for. Part of keeping them safe means keeping them under control. You being forced to shoot the dogs is simply a natural consequence of the owner's negligent care of the dogs.
Yes, and we've have seen them have problems controllfing the dogs before, but I always try to give people the benefit of the doubt, so I never said anything. There is a leash law in my city, and I've never seen these dogs on a leash. The mastif didn't have a collar on to grab hold of, and he was slippery when trying to get him under control during the first attack. It was just bad.
I would do again, I know I did the right thing, but it still sucks. I've never lived in fear, but now I worry about going outside. The others live 2 doors down. I fear retaliation, at least as a civil suite, so if you know of any lawyers for this type of thing, I welcome the recommendations.
I know this my first post, but i've learked quite awhile.
Thank you again.
Very few people will pay lots of their own money for a case they would most likely lose.