Remember the 4th rule: "Don't do any of the above at stupid times."Crossfire wrote:Hmmm, reminds me of the three rules of stupid - Don't go to stupid places. Don't hang out with stupid people. Don't do stupid things.
Sounds like we managed to accomplish the trifecta!
Search found 2 matches
Return to “WATAUGA, Texas - Home Invasion Suspect Shot”
- Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:21 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: WATAUGA, Texas - Home Invasion Suspect Shot
- Replies: 29
- Views: 3363
Re: WATAUGA, Texas - Home Invasion Suspect Shot
- Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:10 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: WATAUGA, Texas - Home Invasion Suspect Shot
- Replies: 29
- Views: 3363
Re: WATAUGA, Texas - Home Invasion Suspect Shot
Be careful with the facts.Anonymous123 wrote:Theres more to it.
Homeowner possesed assault rifle of 7.62x39 or 7.62x54 caliber with criminal priors for drug possesions.
AK-47 or Mosin Nagant, possibly any other high calibered rifle.
The projectile entered through suspects chest through collar bone traveling in a sideways path and exited through right arm, blatantly showing that the suspect was standing sideways and did not turn to face the homeowner.
Son is well known drug dealer, extremely violent and dangerous.
IMO Castle law should be reamended to better suit special cases such as these, Criminal on Criminal crimes, no-one is innocent in this case.
According to the article, the homeowner found his rear door pried and two suspects holding residents of the house at gun point. The suspect then allegedly "turned and pointed his handgun at him" (the homeowner). Starting with a suspect facing directly away (which is not known), a 45 degree turn could accomplish this and a shot fired at that point could easily follow the trajectory outlined above.
Nowhere does the article state that the suspect faced the homeowner directly prior to being shot.
I don't see any apparent contradiction between the homeowner's account and the forensic evidence as described.