Nothing wrong with that. Good practice, in fact.Dave2 wrote:Oh I do that, too, but I'd like a pocket carry-able BUG anyway. If I can find one I like, it might as well be light enough for my belt-less shorts to hold up.Excaliber wrote:One viable alternative under the gym shorts around the house situation is a couple of strategically concealed guns that are only a couple steps away from and preferably out of sight of critical areas like the exterior doors. This takes a little thought, but makes it easy to retrieve one before answering the door or in the event of a prowler.
Search found 10 matches
Return to “Short review: Sig P238”
- Sun Aug 14, 2011 12:32 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
- Sat Aug 13, 2011 8:36 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
One viable alternative under the gym shorts around the house situation is a couple of strategically concealed guns that are only a couple steps away from and preferably out of sight of critical areas like the exterior doors. This takes a little thought, but makes it easy to retrieve one before answering the door or in the event of a prowler.Dave2 wrote:Neither do I... Ok, so I have come home exhausted once or twice and just flopped down on my bed without taking anything off or out of my pockets. But other than those rare occasions... neither do I.Excaliber wrote:I don't carry at all while in bed or in the shower.......Dave2 wrote:What about when you're not wearing a belt?Pawpaw wrote:I just simply haven't found a need to pocket carry. Belt carry just isn't a problem for me.
I do, however, prefer to roam the house in my gym shorts, even instead of my favorite pair of jeans. They're just so much more comfortable*. Also, they lack belt loops.
*It's like I was telling my Mom... the weight of my gun has never been a problem (truthfully, I kinda like it...), but sometimes the belt tension required to keep said weight where I put it does get to me. I think that's why I like the gym shorts so much; you don't need to keep them tight to prevent them from falling down. Even if my pockets are empty and I don't have my gun on me, my jeans will fall down under their own weight if I don't tighten my belt.
On body carry is clearly more accessible, a little quicker, and therefore better, but the other option is very viable if there aren't youngsters or other people you need to be concerned about in the house. In that case, on body is the best way to go with whatever rig works for you.
A belly band or smart carry are good options if you're OK with the relatively small discomfort each involves.
- Sat Aug 13, 2011 1:14 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
I don't carry at all while in bed or in the shower.......Dave2 wrote:What about when you're not wearing a belt?Pawpaw wrote:I just simply haven't found a need to pocket carry. Belt carry just isn't a problem for me.
- Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:41 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
Ah, that's much easier to understand.Pawpaw wrote:I guess I wasn't clear. I don't carry the P238. My Ultra CDP rides my belt every day!Excaliber wrote:Not everyone is as strong willed as you and able to resist those seductive Ultra Carries, particularly when there's one in the safe right next to the P238 which is going to be carried on the belt anyway.Pawpaw wrote:I have both an Ultra CDP II and a P238. Guess which one I carry?
I like the P238 and I'm fine with its trigger. It is heavier than the 1911 trigger, but only enough to be safe for a pocket-able gun. It is still very crisp.
I just simply haven't found a need to pocket carry. Belt carry just isn't a problem for me. If I DID want to pocket carry, the P238 is what I would carry.
I like the P238, but haven't found a good reason for me NOT to carry the Kimber!
Hello. My name is Pawpaw and I am a 1911 addict. I don't want to be "cured"!
Every time I get tempted to pick up one of those easy carrying little guns (like at every gun show) I stop and think: What if that's what I was carrying when I really needed to defend myself or my loved ones?
Thinking about the way one of those scenarios would unfold enables me to put it back down on the display table and continue walking on the path of light.
- Sat Aug 13, 2011 11:41 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
Not everyone is as strong willed as you and able to resist those seductive Ultra Carries, particularly when there's one in the safe right next to the P238 which is going to be carried on the belt anyway.Pawpaw wrote:I have both an Ultra CDP II and a P238. Guess which one I carry?Excaliber wrote:I understand, and it makes sense.wgoforth wrote:Lol, keep in mind these are intended for pocket carry and not for matches, so I can understand why they want to give these a heavier trigger. Here are the specs from their website showing trigger pull (although it feels lighter than that to me) http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProductD ... 8-sas.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You should still follow my previous advice unless you are ready to spend money.
A light SA trigger on a gun in a serious defensive caliber in an envelope only slightly larger and heavier than that pretty Sig you've got makes too much sense to walk away from once you've shot one.
Not to mention you can get highly reliable reasonably priced magazines for it in lots of different sizes and configurations almost anywhere all day long.
I know you want to stay happy with the little Sig, so just keep your distance from those seductive, homewrecking Ultra Carries.
I like the P238 and I'm fine with its trigger. It is heavier than the 1911 trigger, but only enough to be safe for a pocket-able gun. It is still very crisp.
I just simply haven't found a need to pocket carry. Belt carry just isn't a problem for me. If I DID want to pocket carry, the P238 is what I would carry.
- Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:59 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
Tactical suggestion:SQLGeek wrote:Will you stop? My wife is going to send you angry letters if I start drooling over a 1911 after having just gotten a Glock...and I already have Tomball Pawn sending me a quote for a Springfield Lightweight Champion, you know, just for "informational purposes".Excaliber wrote:I understand, and it makes sense.wgoforth wrote:Lol, keep in mind these are intended for pocket carry and not for matches, so I can understand why they want to give these a heavier trigger. Here are the specs from their website showing trigger pull (although it feels lighter than that to me) http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProductD ... 8-sas.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You should still follow my previous advice unless you are ready to spend money.
A light SA trigger on a gun in a serious defensive caliber in an envelope only slightly larger and heavier than that pretty Sig you've got makes too much sense to walk away from once you've shot one.
Not to mention you can get highly reliable reasonably priced magazines for it in lots of different sizes and configurations almost anywhere all day long.
I know you want to stay happy with the little Sig, so just keep your distance from those seductive, homewrecking Ultra Carries.
Let your wife shoot the 1911, and she'll start bugging you to buy it.
Of course, you'll be a nice guy and let her have her way.....
- Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:52 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
I understand, and it makes sense.wgoforth wrote:Lol, keep in mind these are intended for pocket carry and not for matches, so I can understand why they want to give these a heavier trigger. Here are the specs from their website showing trigger pull (although it feels lighter than that to me) http://www.sigsauer.com/CatalogProductD ... 8-sas.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You should still follow my previous advice unless you are ready to spend money.
A light SA trigger on a gun in a serious defensive caliber in an envelope only slightly larger and heavier than that pretty Sig you've got makes too much sense to walk away from once you've shot one.
Not to mention you can get highly reliable reasonably priced magazines for it in lots of different sizes and configurations almost anywhere all day long.
I know you want to stay happy with the little Sig, so just keep your distance from those seductive, homewrecking Ultra Carries.
- Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:06 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
An 8 pound trigger on a single action gun??!!wgoforth wrote:Excaliber wrote:It is, but it would put you back into a long, relatively heavy trigger pull that will feel much worse now that you've experienced the delights of the SAO side.wgoforth wrote:Actually the Kimber Solo looks interesting....Excaliber wrote:Nice gun and I'm glad you're happy with it.
Avoid trying a Kimber Ultra Carry until your bank account can handle the next upgrade.
The Sig 238 has an 8 lb trigger. The Taurus TCP has a 5 lb and Bodyguard an 8 lb... so not much difference in that catagory, but as you say, less travel.
Definitely don't try a Kimber Ultra Carry - unless you can afford to buy one on the spot.
- Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:55 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
It is, but it would put you back into a long, relatively heavy trigger pull that will feel much worse now that you've experienced the delights of the SAO side.wgoforth wrote:Actually the Kimber Solo looks interesting....Excaliber wrote:Nice gun and I'm glad you're happy with it.
Avoid trying a Kimber Ultra Carry until your bank account can handle the next upgrade.
- Wed Aug 10, 2011 8:42 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Short review: Sig P238
- Replies: 77
- Views: 13160
Re: Short review: Sig P238
Nice gun and I'm glad you're happy with it.
Avoid trying a Kimber Ultra Carry until your bank account can handle the next upgrade.
Avoid trying a Kimber Ultra Carry until your bank account can handle the next upgrade.