I have one of those and it's a nice shooting gun.Rugerboy50 wrote:Think I'm starting to lean towards a Springfield Loaded 5" Parkerized finish for my 1st one.
It's not going to be a CC piece.
Great input from everyone so far.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “1911 4" vs 5" barrell”
- Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:39 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2501
Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell
- Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:49 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2501
Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell
I very much agree with Skiprr here. The 5" 1911's are a pure pleasure to shoot, and are fine for uniformed duty carry for LEO's.Skiprr wrote:I use 230 gr. +P Ranger SD rounds, and though snappier than standard 230 gr. FMJ practice rounds, the load is still not uncomfortable at all, even one-handed, in my 3-inch Kimber.Excaliber wrote:They're surprisingly easy to shoot. My 3" Kimber Ultra Carry almost always surprises folks who try it because the recoil is not at all uncomfortable or difficult to manage.
I didn't own any 1911-format pistols that weren't 5-inch barrels until 2007, so I kinda know where your purist friend is coming from. However, I think your purchase needs to be purpose-driven. If you want a carry pistol and don't think you want to carry a full-size 1911, then you may be really happy with a 5-inch as a range gun, but it may get left behind as a daily carry in favor of something smaller. If you're wanting something suitable for NRA pistol competition, a 5-inch with an adjustable rear sight will be better.Rugerboy50 wrote:A co worker says to truly appreciate a 1911 you have to get a 5" barrel 1st.
But as someone else said, 1911s are like potato chips: even with best intentions otherwise, once you have one, you'll want another.
My first 1911 was a 5" and I carried it extensively off duty. However, the size and weight of that envelope require more accommodations than I choose to make for daily carry today, so I favor the shorter barrels for that purpose.
Each to his or her own, and YMMV.
- Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:31 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2501
Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell
They're surprisingly easy to shoot. My 3" Kimber Ultra Carry almost always surprises folks who try it because the recoil is not at all uncomfortable or difficult to manage.speedsix wrote:...after a short time with a WWI 1911(no A1), I bought a Combat Commander...satin nickel...pretty little thing...and carried that for about 6 years...if I bought another 1911, it'd be a 5" stainless...I like the balance and extra length...I was perfectly happy with the shorter barrel...had a rookie who had the Commander(aluminum frame) and was afraid of the recoil because it was lighter...we'd go out to shoot and he'd shoot mine...I loaded both and held them one in each hand with just thumb and forefinger holding them and emptied them into the target...asked him which one jumped up the most...he admitted neither...and enjoyed his Commander very well since that time...I've never fired a 3"...
- Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:13 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2501
Re: 1911 4" vs 5" barrell
Andy's advice here is spot on.AndyC wrote:The difference is hardly noticeable - go with the 4" first time, seeing as you want it anyway.
A 4 inch barrel is the best compromise in the areas of shootability and carryability. You can't go wrong with this choice. It will do everything the others will do except fit inside the same envelope as the 3 inch - and this is a specialized circumstance need.
For years I had a 5" and a 3" and carried the 3" almost all the time - until I picked up an aluminum frame Kimber Pro Carry 4". That's been my "all the time" gun ever since except for those special circumstances.
If you find you have other needs (or more likely wants) later, you can always pick up one of the others.